Should the optional parameter truly be optional? because without it is not enough to designate neither source nor copyright status. (especial in the cases where there on Wikimedia under the fair-use clause. --21:45, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
- When I added that parameter I thought it was better to not break previous versions of the template, and the Default Image Upload Licenses has this on it and does not allow parameters. Also, in most cases I've seen, the file has the same name on both the Wiki and Wikipedia.
- I agree that the parameter should not be optional anyway. --Yoshord 04:02, August 5, 2010 (UTC)
- How about when the parameter is not set, it adds to an maintenance category? -- 05:15, August 5, 2010 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.